Over the past two nights (April 27 and 28, 2015), PBS broadcasted
four programs relating to the Vietnam War, marking the fortieth anniversary of
the final retreat of Americans from that country when Saigon was captured by
the North Vietnamese forces. The four programs are: The Draft, Dick Cavett’s
Vietnam, The Day the 60’s Died,
and Last Days in Vietnam.
These programs serve as a useful reminder of how tumultuous
a time the late 60s and early 70s were. The current political divisions in the
U.S. pale in comparison with that period. Sometimes it appears that there has
been a collective amnesia about this period; losing a war as decisively as the
U.S. lost in Vietnam is not a part of American history people like to dwell on.
Also, it is instructive to note that those born at the time Saigon was captured
by the North Vietnamese are now 40 years old and have no memory of this period.
To someone of my generation, 40 is not old, but neither is it young.
By far the most interesting documentary of the four shown on
PBS is Rory Kennedy’s Last Days in
Vietnam. It details the chaotic departure of the last Americans form
Vietnam, the chaos at the American Embassy in Saigon during the final days, and
the efforts of American government officials, sometimes against official
orders, to evacuate Vietnamese who worked with the Americans and were in
danger. It is a fascinating history.
The least interesting, though worthy program, was the one on
the draft. It reviews the history of conscription in the U.S. and presents the
arguments pro and con for the draft as opposed to an all-volunteer army. It is
the least interesting, since the arguments, though fairly presented, are not
new to anyone who has thought about this subject.
Dick Cavett’s Vietnam reminds
one not only of the turmoil of the period but also what a good late night talk
show he had. He was an engaging host with more interesting guests who currently
show up on the late night programs.
The documentary I have mixed feelings about but think is
terrible flawed is Last Days in Vietnam.
It focuses on the killings of four students and the wounding of nine by the
National Guard at Kent State University on May 4, 1970. Some of the material it
presents is interesting, and it is worth watching because it shows how the
Vietnam War had badly divided the country.
However, the implication that the documentary seeks to
convey is wrong. It implies that the antiwar movement lost and points to
Richard Nixon’s landslide win against George McGovern in November 1972 as
proof. This is a perversion of history.
The antiwar movement had a profound effect in changing
public attitudes toward the war until what had been a fringe opinion became the
majority view. For me, I saw the turning point at my high school graduation in
1970. The commencement speaker was Otis Chandler, the father of a classmate of
mine (Norman Chandler) and the publisher of the Los Angeles Times, which did not have the reputation of being a
leftist newspaper. He announced in his commencement speech that the L.A. Times would run an editorial the
next day arguing that the U.S. should effectively call it quits on Vietnam.
Most of my classmates and I had long before come to that conclusion and were pleased
at what he said. The view that the U.S. should get out of Vietnam had become
mainstream.
As Rory Kennedy’s documentary shows, when Saigon was
threatened, President Ford was unable to get the Congress to appropriate any
more money to try to fend the North Vietnamese from taking the capital of South
Vietnam. Public opinion had turned. The Day
the 60s Died ignores the significant role of the antiwar movement in changing
public opinion. It is a serious flaw. We need to get history right.
No comments:
Post a Comment