Many of the news articles and commentary on the
legislative deal that President Trump made with House Minority Leader Nancy
Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer implies that the new deadline
for increasing the debt limit is in December of this year. What the
legislation that was enacted actually does, though, is suspend the debt
limit until December 9, when the new debt limit will be set at the amount of
public debt subject to limit on that date. The Treasury is precluded from
borrowing to increase its cash holdings above “normal operating balances” in
anticipation of this deadline.
Note though that Treasury has been able to meet its
obligations even though the debt limit has been frozen since March 15, the end
of the last suspension period. It has been able to free up borrowing room while
staying in compliance with the debt limit by the use of “extraordinary measures.”
The
Treasury described these measures on March 16.
These measures will now be reversed and will be able
to be reactivated on December 10 if the Congress has not increased the debt
limit. There are a couple of things worth noting about this.
First, this is a relatively new way for Congress to
deal with the debt limit. Prior to using the suspension measure, Congress would
increase the debt limit by an amount which it estimated would give Treasury the
desired time before it needed to come back to Congress for another increase.
The suspension method makes it unnecessary to do any estimation of borrowing
needs.
Second, the date for which the debt limit needs to be increased
to avoid default does not coincide with the date for which the continuing
resolution provides funds for government spending. The date for which the legal
authority for the government to spend money ends is December 8. If Congress
does nothing, there will be a government shutdown in December, but the Treasury
will be able to avoid default for some time after that. (An
article in Business Insider speculates that Treasury might be able to
manage without an increase in the debt limit until next summer.)
This second point has been missed by much of the
political commentary on the deal. Contrary to much of the political commentary,
the debt limit may not be a political tool for the Democrats at the end of this
year, but it may provide them leverage at some point next year.
Of course, the reason the debt limit provides the
Democrats with political leverage is that the Republicans do not have the
votes, even in the House where there is no filibuster, to pass an increase in
or suspension of the debt limit on their own. They need Democratic votes,
because there are Freedom Caucus members who will not vote for a debt limit measure
without it containing politically unacceptable provisions. In other words, the
political tactics of the Freedom Caucus give Congressional Democrats more
legislative power than they otherwise would have.
No comments:
Post a Comment