The National Park Service is proposing increasing fees at seventeen national parks. They are: Acadia National Park, Arches National Park, Bryce Canyon National Park, Canyonlands National Park, Denali National Park, Glacier National Park, Grand Canyon National Park, Grand Teton National Park, Joshua Tree National Park, Mount Rainier National Park, Rocky Mountain National Park, Olympic National Park, Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Park, Shenandoah National Park, Yellowstone National Park, Yosemite National Park, and Zion National Park.
The proposed fee increases are significant. For example, at
Shenandoah National Park, the fee per passenger vehicle is currently $25. This
would increase to $70 during the peak season (June-October). An annual pass to
the park, which currently costs $50, will increase to $75. (More details about
the proposed fees for this and the other parks can be found in a NPS pdf
document that can be downloaded here.)
Timothy Egan wrote about a week ago why he opposes these fee
increases in
a column for The New York Times. People who wish to submit comments to the
NPS can do so online or by writing a letter. The address for physical letters
is in the document linked above. Online submissions can be
submitted here. Note that the comment period ends November 23 at 11:59 PM
Mountain Time. (For some reason, the NPS chose Thanksgiving Day for the end of
the comment period.)
I am opposed to these fee increases. Below is reproduced my
comment to the NPS about this.
I write to urge you
not to implement this proposal to raise fees for certain national parks but
rather to seek other revenue sources for needed maintenance and upkeep for all
of the national parks. One of the great assets of our country is its natural
beauty, and the U.S. government has acted to conserve some of the most
beautiful areas, beginning in 1872 with the establishment of Yellowstone
National Park, as national parks for current and future generations. Charging
the high fees which the National Park Service is proposing will limit the
ability of all except the affluent to visit the national parks to which they
apply. The national parks were not established for the enjoyment of just the
richest of our citizens. They are owned by all Americans, and pricing should
not be so high as to limit the ability of all but the affluent to enjoy the
parks.
With respect to the
Washington, DC area where I live, it is not at all clear that hiking the fees
for Shenandoah National Park will result in much of a revenue increase. It will
lead to enforcement issues, since there are ways to access this park without driving
on Skyline Drive. Moreover, many may decide to make more excursions to the
mountains in George Washington National Forest on the other side of the
Shenandoah Valley rather than paying $70 per vehicle to enter Shenandoah
National Park.
To take another
example, Rocky Mountain National Park is certainly a beautiful place, but there
are other beautiful places in Colorado. The proposed fees will certainly limit
the number of visits to Rocky Mountain National Park.
Also, while there may
be legal reasons why some national parks do not charge fees, there is no
offered public policy reason why vehicles entering Shenandoah National Park
should be charged $70 during the peak season while vehicles entering Great
Smoky Mountains National Park on the other end of the Blue Ridge Parkway should
be charged nothing. Since, according to the proposal, 20 percent of the
collected fees at the parks charging a fee will go to other parks, it is not
explained why visitors to certain parks should subsidize the financial needs of
parks not charging a fee.
Finally, I note that
as a holder of a Senior Pass, I am not directly affected by this proposal.
However, I urge you not to implement these proposed fee increases not out of
self-interest but because they go against some of the purposes for creating the
national parks in the first place. In short, this proposal is bad public
policy.
Update (11/21/2017):The NPS has extended the deadline for comments on the fee increase to December 22, 2017 (23:59 Mountain Time). If you care about this, please comment. As the reversal on elephant trophies demonstrates, the Trump Administration is not impervious to criticism of its proposed actions.
Update (11/21/2017):The NPS has extended the deadline for comments on the fee increase to December 22, 2017 (23:59 Mountain Time). If you care about this, please comment. As the reversal on elephant trophies demonstrates, the Trump Administration is not impervious to criticism of its proposed actions.
No comments:
Post a Comment